War Violence Against Women: Part 4 of 4

In September 2012, the documentary “The Invisible War” was released. It chronicles the experiences of many military personnel and the sexual trauma, specifically rape, which they experienced and the lawsuit these survivors have filed. Ten years ago a study was published in the American Journal of Industrial Medicine called “Factors Associated With Women’s Risk of Rape in the Military Environment” that had already outlined much of what the film covered.

Both the film and the study demonstrate that a sexualized environment increases the chance of rape, alcohol is often involved, reporting does not often happen for fear of retribution, and disciplinary action was insignificant or non-existent. As I mentioned in a previous blog, “If you serve in the U.S. military and you rape or sexually assault a fellow service member, chances are you won’t be punished. In fact, you have an estimated 86.5% chance of keeping your crime a secret and a 92% chance of avoiding a court-martial” (CNN Opinion).

A few notes from the study:
•    Women reporting hostile work environments had approximately six-fold greater odds of rape.
•    Consistent rates of rape across eras of service [Vietnam War to Persian Gulf War] indicate that violence towards military women remains an unresolved problem.
•    The assailant was often identified as someone who had sexually harassed the victim, frequently a non-commissioned officer, and someone under the influence of drugs or alcohol.
•    Rape occurred more frequently on base and off-duty. The time of day most often reported for rape occurrence was 6 pm to midnight. Barracks were commonly identified as the location of rape.
•    Three-fourths of women who were raped did not report the incident to a ranking officer. One fourth of victims indicated they did not file a report because the rapist was the ranking officer. One third did not report rape because the rapist was a friend of the ranking officer.
•    Most victims acknowledged a sense of shame, futility, or fear of the possible negative effects of officially reporting rape. These women believed that nothing would be done, reporting would make the work situation worse, or their military careers would be adversely affected.

At the end of the film, it provocatively states, “In December 2011, the Court dismissed the survivors’ lawsuit ruling that rape is an occupational hazard of military service. An appeal has been filed.” While the Court’s dismissal does not say this explicitly (and the filmmakers have been accused of being inflammatory), the motion for dismissal by the Defense does: “On November 18, 2011, the District Court (J. O’Grady) heard oral argument. Defendants [former Secretaries of Defense Rumsfeld and Gates] argued, in essence, that unpunished rape and sexual assault should be viewed as ‘incident to service’ — i.e. an occupational hazard — for those who join the military services. Defendants [former Secretaries of Defense Rumsfeld and Gates] argued that the federal courts are not permitted to adjudicate whether they violated the law because doing so would intrude upon military discipline" (KORI CIOCA et al. v. DONALD RUMSFELD et al., page 7). The plaintiffs are demanding justice; they haven’t received it from the military and now the Judicial Branch says it’s none of their business.

Showing signs of change, on January 4, 2013, President Obama signed the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013. It includes stopping “enlistment waivers for individuals with felony rape, sexual abuse, sexual assault, or related offenses;” offering “better training for new commanders to create command environments that do not tolerate sexual assault, and to educate the commanders of the resources available for survivors and the disciplinary procedures for rapists;” and “improved reporting on sexual assault prevention, training, investigation, and prosecution throughout the Armed Forces.”

Make the Connection offers a lot of resources and support for U.S. veterans, many of whom may have been really “successful" during war (rape & pillage) and are readjusting to “normal." I encourage you to check out the work they’re doing and do something (anything) to support the survivors.

War Violence Against Women: Part 2 of 4

Today, on January 24, 2013, women and girls are continuing to be assaulted in Syria and refugee camps (IRC’s Press Release). And no doubt women in other war zones, like Afghanistan, Somalia, Iraq, and Mexico are experiencing this as well. UN Women reports, “Women in war-torn societies can face specific and devastating forms of sexual violence, which are sometimes deployed systematically to achieve military or political objectives. […] Even after conflict has ended, the impacts of sexual violence persist, including unwanted pregnancies, sexually transmitted infections and stigmatization.”

Rape and sexual violence aren’t supposed to be a part of war anymore (or life, for that matter). In 1949, the Geneva Convention stated, “Women shall be especially protected against any attack on their honour, in particular against rape, enforced prostitution, or any form of indecent assault.” And then in 2008, the UN Security Council reinforced this with Resolution 1820 which, among other things, “Demands the immediate and complete cessation by all parties to armed  conflict of all acts of sexual violence against civilians with immediate effect.” It stresses the importance that peace cannot and will not occur while sexual violence continues to exist.

Yesterday I blogged about rape occurring during war in Syria, I’m assuming by Syrian men. “Those men" (yesterday’s blog). But U.S. soldiers commit sexual violence as well, which the general population usually doesn’t hear about. “If you serve in the U.S. military and you rape or sexually assault a fellow service member, chances are you won’t be punished. In fact, you have an estimated 86.5% chance of keeping your crime a secret and a 92% chance of avoiding a court-martial” (CNN Opinion).

That leaves me to wonder, what are the chances of “keeping it a secret” if the assault is against a civilian in another country… especially during war? Because “war” is WAR. I found it challenging to find reliable sources for sexual violence incidents involving U.S. soldiers, but they’re there. In March 2006, U.S soldiers raped and killed a 14- or 15-year-old Iraqi girl (Washington Post and BBC News). And then in March 2012, one U.S. soldier (or many?) killed 9 children and 7 adults (including 2 women that had been raped) (BBC News and Steve Lendman’s Blog).

All this to say…???

3 days ago I would have considered myself quite knowledgeable about the often difficult plight of women worldwide. Turns out that even though I continue to educate myself about it, there’s still a lot I don’t know… or don’t connect with… or have a hard time believing it can be any worse.

Created in 2010, UN Women (United Nations Entity for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women) offers useful information and resources, and “works for the elimination of discrimination against women and girls; empowerment of women; and achievement of equality between women and men as partners and beneficiaries of development, human rights, humanitarian action and peace and security." I encourage you to check out the work they’re doing.

War Violence Against Women: Part 1 of 4

Today while I was driving home from work and listening to the radio, I heard this story broadcast on NPR’s “All Things Considered.” It’s 4 minutes long: “Rape A ‘Significant And Disturbing’ Feature Of Syrian War.”  It discusses the report that the International Rescue Committee released last week. The report states, “Syrians identified rape as a primary reason their families fled the country” (IRC’s Press Release).

When I think about war, the term “rape & pillage” comes to my mind without thinking twice. But then I stop myself and ask… who’s being raped? Women are being raped and violated. Girls are being raped and injured. And then I ask… who’s raping them? Sons are doing this. Brothers are committing this.

It would be easy to say, “Those people are raping those people."

“Those people”… this is a term that always makes me cringe in a conversation. “Those people” is a negative phrase that (by my personal definition) means “human beings who I do not attempt to identify with nor show sympathy for and, for all intents and purposes, is unlike me and is therefore my enemy.” I think it’s used as a defense mechanism to distance ourselves from others’ suffering. Once we’ve crossed over a line in our belief system, I believe it’s possible for one human being to abuse another human being and sincerely not recognize the act as immoral and unethical.

So, why am I discussing this on a Fertility Awareness blog? Because I am wholly invested in women and the truth of the matter is that women, here and around the world, are often oppressed and violated (i.e. browbeaten, subjugated, demoralized, exploited). Want to make a difference? Check out the Colorado Coalition Against Sexual Assault